| | Jk2 gone..ehm..wrong? |  |
|
+4Lucifer Vader Kernow Pilgrim Boogieman 8 posters |
| Author | Message |
|---|
Boogieman
Jedi Master
Posts : 941
| Subject: Jk2 gone..ehm..wrong?  Wed 18 May 2011, 6:50 am | |
| | |
|
| | |
Kernow Pilgrim
Legend
Posts : 10648
| | Subject: Re: Jk2 gone..ehm..wrong? Wed 18 May 2011, 7:24 am | |
| lovely sound effects sound like a computer loading and crashing xD | |
|
| | |
Vader
Sith Warrior
Posts : 4359
| | Subject: Re: Jk2 gone..ehm..wrong? Wed 18 May 2011, 10:37 am | |
| at 1:27  and at the end...wtf  | |
|
| | |
Lucifer
Legend
Posts : 2344
| | Subject: Re: Jk2 gone..ehm..wrong? Wed 18 May 2011, 11:28 am | |
| lol, aggreed with vader... So messed up but i like the funny humpy in the air thing, anything else was just messed up lol! including the taunt.. | |
|
| | |
Proballboy
Posts : 1562
| | Subject: Re: Jk2 gone..ehm..wrong? Wed 18 May 2011, 2:28 pm | |
| | |
|
| | |
Leonardo
Jedi Knight
Posts : 2741
| | Subject: Re: Jk2 gone..ehm..wrong? Wed 18 May 2011, 3:37 pm | |
| | |
|
| | |
purple_kush
Posts : 108
| | Subject: Re: Jk2 gone..ehm..wrong? Sun 22 May 2011, 4:45 pm | |
| looks like it was versin 1.02. the sounds, yeah, very weird. but the movements and such are version 1.02 for sure. | |
|
| | |
Boogieman
Jedi Master
Posts : 941
| | Subject: Re: Jk2 gone..ehm..wrong? Tue 24 May 2011, 11:28 pm | |
| - purple_kush wrote:
- looks like it was versin 1.02. the sounds, yeah, very weird. but the movements and such are version 1.02 for sure.
Yeah it was 1.02. When you choke someone you can move around with him much faster and longer. | |
|
| | |
Weaver
Posts : 86
| | Subject: Re: Jk2 gone..ehm..wrong? Sun 21 Aug 2011, 3:04 am | |
| Lol, that part at nar shadda was funny  , Like if a computer were overheating | |
|
| | |
Boogieman
Jedi Master
Posts : 941
| | Subject: Re: Jk2 gone..ehm..wrong? Sun 21 Aug 2011, 4:12 am | |
| - Weaver wrote:
- Lol, that part at nar shadda was funny , Like if a computer were overheating
A windows 95 with Crysis HD | |
|
| | |
Sponsored content
| | Subject: Re: Jk2 gone..ehm..wrong? | |
| |
|
| | |
| | Jk2 gone..ehm..wrong? | |
|
